Key Concepts:
- Knew Pollock would be a great artist.
- summer of 1947; saw his 1st Pollock splatter painting.
- Statement of Purpose: Intended to paint large movable pictures which functioned between toe easel & murals.
- Believed the easel to be a dying form, & that the tendency of modern art was leading towards the wall from.
- Pictures intended to be a half-way state, Pollock's intent was to point out the future of the art world without arriving there completely.
- Spatter technique intended to "break the plane," saved elbow/wrist from strain, unique & technical.
- Paintings Apollonian, not Dionysian.
- Sold approximately 1 picture a year, lived off of advances.
- Was an outsider in the art world.
Definitely showed how the person criticizing an artist/their works can make a judgement as an outsider on someone else's works, yet still have a firm grasp of their techniques/meanings.
Opinion:
Found the information pertinent to how I will be criticizing another person's work.
Jackson Pollock: Michael Fried & T.J. Clark in Conversation
Key Concepts:
- Pollack: Modernist master, 1 of the most important painters of the 20th century.
- Key figure, brings to light issues, work raises "burning problems."
- Clark: Avant-Garde art; emphasis on historical aspects.
- Fried: leader in Modernist movement; aesthetic/positive qualities; renewal.
- Both agree about Pollock's status as artist.
- Dispersal of energy, quality of deployment of line/energy.
- Optical = energy of picture.
- Every inch different from every other.
- Extraordinary differentiation from point to point.
- Drive of Modernist painting: wanting to intensify surfaces/maximize presence.
- Gives a picture of conditions under which a certain difficulty can be aesthetic.
- Agree on need for historical account of Pollack's radical abstraction, but also that its historical significance cannot be separated from its pictorial quality.
The video definitely relates to the Art Criticism project because it shows how 2 very different views of 1 artist can both be accurate in their own way, & how despite these differences there is also similarities, & ways that of viewing an artist/art, can be agreed upon.
Opinion:
Interesting, informative, show how to critique a piece without being judgmental, or disagreeable with another person's opinions.
No comments:
Post a Comment